Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/Apps/ReviewStahler83"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Governing Equations== | ==Governing Equations== | ||
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] states that the <font color="darkgreen">equilibrium configuration is found by solving the equation for momentum balance together with Poisson's equation for the gravitational potential</font>, <math>~\Phi_g</math>. Working in cylindrical coordinates <math>~(\varpi, z)</math> (the assumption of axisymmetry eliminates the azimuthal angle), <font color="darkgreen">the momentum equation is</font> (see Stahler's equation 2): | |||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border=" | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~\frac{\nabla P}{\rho} + \nabla\Phi_g + \nabla\Phi_c</math> | ||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
where, <math>~\nabla \equiv (\partial/\partial\varpi, \partial/\partial z)</math>, and the centrifugal potential is given by (see Stahler's equation 3): | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~\Phi_c(\varpi)</math> | ||
\ | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~\equiv</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~ | ||
\int_0^\varpi \frac{j^2(\varpi^') d\varpi^'}{(\varpi^')^3} \, , | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
where <math>~j</math> is the z-component of the angular momentum per unit mass. Except for the overall sign, this last expression is precisely the same expression for the centrifugal potential that we [[User:Tohline/AxisymmetricConfigurations/SolutionStrategies#Simple_Rotation_Profile_and_Centrifugal_Potential|have defined in the context of our discussion of ''simple rotation profiles]]'' and, as Stahler stresses, it implicitly assumes <font color="darkgreen">that <math>~j</math> is not a function of <math>~z</math></font>; this builds in the physical constraint enunciated by the [[User:Tohline/2DStructure/AxisymmetricInstabilities#Poincar.C3.A9-Wavre_Theorem|Poincaré-Wavre theorem]], <font color="darkgreen">which guarantees that rotational velocity is constant on cylinders for the equilibrium of any barotropic fluid</font>. | |||
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] chooses to use the ''integral'' form of Poisson's equation to define the gravitational potential, namely (see his equation 10), | |||
<div align="center" id="GravitationalPotential"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~ \Phi_g(\vec{x})</math> | ||
\ | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
Line 52: | Line 61: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~ G \int \frac{\rho(\vec{x}^{~'})}{|\vec{x}^{~'} - \vec{x}|} d^3x^' \, .</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Except for the overall sign, this matches the expression for the '''[[User:Tohline/SR/PoissonOrigin#Step_1|Scalar Gravitational Potential]]''' that is widely used in astrophysics. | |||
As we have demonstrated in our [[User:Tohline/AxisymmetricConfigurations/SolutionStrategies#2DgoverningEquations|overview discussion of axisymmetric configurations]], the equations that govern the equilibrium properties of axisymmetric structures are, | |||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border=" | <table border="1" cellpadding="8" align="center"><tr><td align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5"> | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~\frac{\ | <math>~ | ||
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial P}{\partial\varpi} + \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial\varpi}\biggr] - \frac{j^2}{\varpi^3} | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
Line 74: | Line 86: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~\ | <math>~ | ||
\biggl[ \frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial P}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial z} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~=</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>~0 \, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~ | <math>~ | ||
\ | \frac{1}{\varpi} \frac{\partial }{\partial\varpi} \biggl[ \varpi \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial\varpi} \biggr] + \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial z^2} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~4\pi G \rho \, .</math> | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</td></tr></table> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Let's compare this set of governing equations with the ones used by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)]. | |||
==Solution Technique== | ==Solution Technique== |
Revision as of 22:07, 3 April 2018
Stahler's (1983) Rotationally Flattened Isothermal Configurations
Consider the collapse of an isothermal cloud (characterized by isothermal sound speed, <math>~c_s</math>) that is initially spherical, uniform in density, uniformly rotating <math>~(\Omega_0)</math>, and embedded in a tenuous intercloud medium of pressure, <math>~P_e</math>. Now suppose that the cloud maintains perfect axisymmetry as it collapses and that <math>~c_s</math> never changes at any fluid element. To what equilibrium state will this cloud collapse if the specific angular momentum of every fluid element is conserved? In a paper titled, The Equilibria of Rotating, Isothermal Clouds. I. - Method of Solution, S. W. Stahler (1983a, ApJ, 268, 155 - 184) describes a numerical scheme — a self-consistent-field technique — that he used to construct such equilibrium states.
In what follows, lines of text that appear in a dark green font have been extracted verbatim from Stahler (1983a).
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Governing Equations
Stahler (1983a) states that the equilibrium configuration is found by solving the equation for momentum balance together with Poisson's equation for the gravitational potential, <math>~\Phi_g</math>. Working in cylindrical coordinates <math>~(\varpi, z)</math> (the assumption of axisymmetry eliminates the azimuthal angle), the momentum equation is (see Stahler's equation 2):
<math>~\frac{\nabla P}{\rho} + \nabla\Phi_g + \nabla\Phi_c</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, ,</math> |
where, <math>~\nabla \equiv (\partial/\partial\varpi, \partial/\partial z)</math>, and the centrifugal potential is given by (see Stahler's equation 3):
<math>~\Phi_c(\varpi)</math> |
<math>~\equiv</math> |
<math>~ \int_0^\varpi \frac{j^2(\varpi^') d\varpi^'}{(\varpi^')^3} \, , </math> |
where <math>~j</math> is the z-component of the angular momentum per unit mass. Except for the overall sign, this last expression is precisely the same expression for the centrifugal potential that we have defined in the context of our discussion of simple rotation profiles and, as Stahler stresses, it implicitly assumes that <math>~j</math> is not a function of <math>~z</math>; this builds in the physical constraint enunciated by the Poincaré-Wavre theorem, which guarantees that rotational velocity is constant on cylinders for the equilibrium of any barotropic fluid.
Stahler (1983a) chooses to use the integral form of Poisson's equation to define the gravitational potential, namely (see his equation 10),
<math>~ \Phi_g(\vec{x})</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ G \int \frac{\rho(\vec{x}^{~'})}{|\vec{x}^{~'} - \vec{x}|} d^3x^' \, .</math> |
Except for the overall sign, this matches the expression for the Scalar Gravitational Potential that is widely used in astrophysics.
As we have demonstrated in our overview discussion of axisymmetric configurations, the equations that govern the equilibrium properties of axisymmetric structures are,
|
Let's compare this set of governing equations with the ones used by Stahler (1983a).
Solution Technique
Following exactly along the lines of the HSCF technique that has been described in an accompanying chapter,
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |