User:Tohline/Appendix/Ramblings/PPToriPt2
Stability Analyses of PP Tori (Part 2)
|
|---|
| | Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
This is a direct extension of our Part 1 discussion. Here we continue our effort to check the validity of the Blaes85 eigenvector. The relevant reference is:
- Blaes (1985), MNRAS, 216, 553 (aka Blaes85) — Oscillations of slender tori.
Start From Scratch
Basic Equations from Blaes85
|
Blaes85
Eq. No. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
<math>~(\beta\eta)^2</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~x^2(1+xb) \, ;</math> |
(2.6) |
|
<math>~b</math> |
<math>~\equiv</math> |
<math>~3\cos\theta - \cos^3\theta \, ;</math> |
(2.6) |
|
<math>~f</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~1-\eta^2 \, .</math> |
(2.5) |
|
Blaes85
Eq. No. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
<math>~LHS \equiv \hat{L}W</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math> ~fx^2 \cdot \frac{\partial^2 W}{\partial x^2} + f \cdot \frac{\partial^2 W}{\partial \theta^2} + \biggl[ \frac{fx(1-2x\cos\theta)}{(1-x\cos\theta)} + nx^2\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\biggr]\frac{\partial W}{\partial x} </math> |
|
|
|
|
<math> + \biggl[ \frac{fx\sin\theta}{(1-x\cos\theta)} + n\cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial \theta}\biggr]\frac{\partial W}{\partial \theta} + \biggl[ \frac{2nx^2m^2}{\beta^2(1-x\cos\theta)^4} - \frac{m^2 x^2 f}{(1-x\cos\theta)^2} \biggr]W </math> |
(4.2) |
|
<math>~RHS</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math> ~-\frac{2nm^2}{\beta^2} \cdot (\beta\eta)^2 \biggl[ M \biggl(\frac{\nu}{m}\biggr)^2 + \frac{N}{m} \biggl(\frac{\nu}{m}\biggr)\biggr] W </math> |
(4.1) |
|
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math> ~-\frac{2nm^2}{\beta^2} \biggl[ x^2 \biggl(\frac{\nu}{m}\biggr)^2 + \frac{2x^2}{(1-x\cos\theta)^2} \biggl(\frac{\nu}{m}\biggr)\biggr] W </math> |
(4.2) |
|
<math>~\frac{W}{A_{00}}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math> ~1 + \beta^2 m^2 \biggl\{ 2\eta^2\cos^2\theta - \frac{3\eta^2}{4(n+1)} - \frac{(4n+1)}{4(n+1)^2} ~\pm~i~\biggl[ \frac{2^3\cdot 3}{(n+1)}\biggr]^{1/2} \eta\cos\theta \biggr\} </math> |
(4.13) |
|
<math>~\frac{\nu}{m}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math> ~-1 ~\pm ~ i~\biggl[ \frac{3}{2(n+1)} \biggr]^{1/2} \beta </math> |
(4.14) |
Our Manipulation of These Equations
|
<math>~\Lambda \equiv \frac{2^2(n+1)^2}{m^2}\biggl[\frac{\delta W}{A_{00}}-1\biggr]</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\beta^2 \biggl\{ 2^3(n+1)^2 \eta^2\cos^2\theta - 3\eta^2(n+1)^2 - (4n+1) ~\pm~i~[ 2^7\cdot 3(n+1)^3 ]^{1/2} \eta\cos\theta \biggr\} </math> |
|
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~- (4n+1)\beta^2 + (\beta\eta)^2 (n+1)^2[ 2^3 \cos^2\theta - 3] ~\pm~i~\beta [ 2^7\cdot 3(n+1)^3 ]^{1/2} (\beta\eta) \cos\theta \, ; </math> |
|
<math>~\Rightarrow~~~~\biggl[\frac{\delta W}{A_{00}}-1\biggr] </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{m}{2(n+1)} \biggr]^2 \Lambda </math> |
See Also
- Imamura & Hadley collaboration:
- Paper I: K. Hadley & J. N. Imamura (2011, Astrophysics and Space Science, 334, 1-26), "Nonaxisymmetric instabilities in self-gravitating disks. I. Toroids" — In this paper, Hadley & Imamura perform linear stability analyses on fully self-gravitating toroids; that is, there is no central point-like stellar object and, hence, <math>~M_*/M_d = 0.0</math>.
- Paper II: K. Z. Hadley, P. Fernandez, J. N. Imamura, E. Keever, R. Tumblin, & W. Dumas (2014, Astrophysics and Space Science, 353, 191-222), "Nonaxisymmetric instabilities in self-gravitating disks. II. Linear and quasi-linear analyses" — In this paper, the Imamura & Hadley collaboration performs "an extensive study of nonaxisymmetric global instabilities in thick, self-gravitating star-disk systems creating a large catalog of star/disk systems … for star masses of <math>~0.0 \le M_*/M_d \le 10^3</math> and inner to outer edge aspect ratios of <math>~0.1 < r_-/r_+ < 0.75</math>."
- Paper III: K. Z. Hadley, W. Dumas, J. N. Imamura, E. Keever, & R. Tumblin (2015, Astrophysics and Space Science, 359, article id. 10, 23 pp.), "Nonaxisymmetric instabilities in self-gravitating disks. III. Angular momentum transport" — In this paper, the Imamura & Hadley collaboration carries out nonlinear simulations of nonaxisymmetric instabilities found in self-gravitating star/disk systems and compares these results with the linear and quasi-linear modeling results presented in Papers I and II.
|
|
|---|
|
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |