Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/Appendix/Ramblings/Photosphere"
(→More Careful Derivation: More elaboration) |
(→More Careful Derivation: Include effect of factor "f") |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
As the accretion stream from the less massive white dwarf impacts the surface of the accretor supersonically, it will heat the accreted material to a post-shock temperature, | As the accretion stream from the less massive white dwarf impacts the surface of the accretor supersonically, it will heat the accreted material to a post-shock temperature, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<math>T_{sh} \approx \frac{GM_a m_p}{kR_a}</math> , | <math>T_{sh} \approx \frac{GM_a m_p}{kR_a}\cdot f</math> , | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
where <math>M_a</math> and <math>R_a</math> are the mass and radius, respectively, of the accretor. Assuming the post-shock material is optically thick to photon radiation, we should ask to what "photospheric" radius, <math>R_{ph}</math>, the envelope of the accretor will have to swell in order for the star (in steady state) to be able to radiate all of the accretion energy? It seems that it will need, | where <math>M_a</math> and <math>R_a</math> are the mass and radius, respectively, of the accretor, and 0 < ''f'' ≤ 1 is a coefficient signifying the fraction of potential energy that is converted into heat. Assuming the post-shock material is optically thick to photon radiation, we should ask to what "photospheric" radius, <math>R_{ph}</math>, the envelope of the accretor will have to swell in order for the star (in steady state) to be able to radiate all of the accretion energy? It seems that it will need, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\biggl[ \frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \biggr]^2 \approx \frac{GM_a \dot{M}}{\pi a_{rad}c R_a^3} \biggl[ \frac{kR_a}{GM_a m_p} \biggr]^4 | \biggl[ \frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \biggr]^2 \approx \frac{GM_a \dot{M}}{\pi a_{rad}c R_a^3} \biggl[ \frac{kR_a}{GM_a m_p} \biggr]^4 f^{-4} | ||
= \biggl[ \frac{15(hc)^3}{8\pi^5 k^4} \biggr] \frac{R_a \dot{M}}{\pi c G^3 M_a^3} \biggl[ \frac{k}{ m_p} \biggr]^4 | = \biggl[ \frac{15(hc)^3}{8\pi^5 k^4} \biggr] \frac{R_a \dot{M}}{\pi c G^3 M_a^3} \biggl[ \frac{k}{ m_p} \biggr]^4 f^{-4} | ||
= \biggl[ \frac{15}{8\pi^5} \biggr] \frac{R_a \dot{M}}{\pi c m_p^4} \biggl[ \frac{hc}{ GM_a} \biggr]^3 | = \biggl[ \frac{15}{8\pi^5} \biggr] \frac{R_a \dot{M}}{\pi c m_p^4} \biggl[ \frac{hc}{ GM_a} \biggr]^3 f^{-4} | ||
\, . | \, . | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \approx | \frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \approx | ||
\biggl[ \frac{20}{\pi^4} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\mu_e^2 M_{Ch}}{ m_3 M_a} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{\dot{M}}{M_a} \cdot \frac{R_a}{c } \biggr]^{1/2} | \biggl[ \frac{20}{\pi^4} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\mu_e^2 M_{Ch}}{ m_3 M_a} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{\dot{M}}{M_a} \cdot \frac{R_a}{c } \biggr]^{1/2} f^{-2} | ||
\, . | \, . | ||
</math> | </math> |
Revision as of 21:37, 6 May 2011
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Locating the Photosphere of Stably Accreting Double White Dwarf Binaries
Context
At our regularly scheduled astrophysics group meeting on Monday, 2 May 2011, Juhan Frank and I started debating the answer to the following question: What should the photospheric radius be of the common envelope that surrounds a stably accreting, double white dwarf (DWD) binary? That is, does an accreting DWD binary that is destined to be an AM CVn system look like a single bloated star? The various mathematical relations that we think are relevant to this question were sketched on the whiteboard in room 218 Johnston Hall (CCT). Here is a photo of that whiteboard discussion and derivation.
More Careful Derivation
As the accretion stream from the less massive white dwarf impacts the surface of the accretor supersonically, it will heat the accreted material to a post-shock temperature,
<math>T_{sh} \approx \frac{GM_a m_p}{kR_a}\cdot f</math> ,
where <math>M_a</math> and <math>R_a</math> are the mass and radius, respectively, of the accretor, and 0 < f ≤ 1 is a coefficient signifying the fraction of potential energy that is converted into heat. Assuming the post-shock material is optically thick to photon radiation, we should ask to what "photospheric" radius, <math>R_{ph}</math>, the envelope of the accretor will have to swell in order for the star (in steady state) to be able to radiate all of the accretion energy? It seems that it will need,
<math> 4\pi R_{ph}^2 \sigma T_{sh}^4 = L_{acc} </math>
<math> \Rightarrow~~~~~\biggl[ \frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \biggr]^2 = \frac{L_{acc}}{\pi a_{rad}c R_a^2 T^4_{sh}} = \frac{GM_a \dot{M}}{\pi a_{rad}c R_a^3 T^4_{sh}} \, , </math>
where we've set <math>4\sigma = a_{rad}c</math> and,
<math> L_{acc} = \frac{GM_a \dot{M}}{R_a} \, . </math>
Replacing <math>T_{sh}</math> by the approximate expression shown above gives,
<math> \biggl[ \frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \biggr]^2 \approx \frac{GM_a \dot{M}}{\pi a_{rad}c R_a^3} \biggl[ \frac{kR_a}{GM_a m_p} \biggr]^4 f^{-4} = \biggl[ \frac{15(hc)^3}{8\pi^5 k^4} \biggr] \frac{R_a \dot{M}}{\pi c G^3 M_a^3} \biggl[ \frac{k}{ m_p} \biggr]^4 f^{-4} = \biggl[ \frac{15}{8\pi^5} \biggr] \frac{R_a \dot{M}}{\pi c m_p^4} \biggl[ \frac{hc}{ GM_a} \biggr]^3 f^{-4} \, . </math>
We recognize that the combination of physical constants in this expression resemble the Chandrasekhar Mass, <math>M_{Ch}</math>. Specifically,
<math> \frac{c^3 h^3}{G^3 m_p^4} = \frac{2^5 \pi^2}{3 m_3^2} [ \mu_e^2 M_\mathrm{Ch} ]^2. </math>
Hence,
<math> \frac{R_{ph}}{R_a} \approx \biggl[ \frac{20}{\pi^4} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{\mu_e^2 M_{Ch}}{ m_3 M_a} \biggr] \biggl[ \frac{\dot{M}}{M_a} \cdot \frac{R_a}{c } \biggr]^{1/2} f^{-2} \, . </math>
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |