Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/Appendix/Ramblings/Saturn"
(→Saturn) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Saturn= | =Saturn= | ||
Here we draw heavily from the review by [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Sci...364.1046S/abstract L. Spilker (14 June 2019)] titled, ''Cassini-Huygens' exploration of the Saturn system: 13 years of discovery'' that has appeared in Science, Vol. 364, Issue 6445, pp. 1046 - 1051. This review reminds us to emphasize that, although virtually all of the chapters of our [[User:Tohline/H_BookTiledMenu#Tiled_Menu|H_Book]] have been written from the standpoint of analyzing the structure, stability, and dynamics of ''stars'', much of our discussion is applicable in a fairly straightforward manner to studies of ''planets'' — especially the gas giants — because they are also self-gravitating fluids. | |||
{{LSU_HBook_header}} | {{LSU_HBook_header}} | ||
==Structure and Stability== | |||
Excerpt from the first paragraph on p. 1050 of [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Sci...364.1046S/abstract L. Spilker (2019)]: | |||
<table border="0" align="center" width="90%"><tr><td align="left"> | |||
<font color="green"> | |||
Saturn's ring system acts like a seismograph, providing a measure of Saturn's internal oscillations (or normal modes) that directly probe the interior of the planet … and provide a means for measuring its deep rotation rate. These vibrations, determined by Saturn's nonuniform internal structure, are probably driven by convection inside the planet, which cause oscillations in Saturn's gravity field … Preliminary modeling of the propagation behavior of this collection of waves provides an interior rotation rate for Saturn of ∼ 10.6 hours … | |||
</font> | |||
</td></tr></table> | |||
==Hexagon Storm== | ==Hexagon Storm== |
Revision as of 20:33, 13 July 2019
Saturn
Here we draw heavily from the review by L. Spilker (14 June 2019) titled, Cassini-Huygens' exploration of the Saturn system: 13 years of discovery that has appeared in Science, Vol. 364, Issue 6445, pp. 1046 - 1051. This review reminds us to emphasize that, although virtually all of the chapters of our H_Book have been written from the standpoint of analyzing the structure, stability, and dynamics of stars, much of our discussion is applicable in a fairly straightforward manner to studies of planets — especially the gas giants — because they are also self-gravitating fluids.
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Structure and Stability
Excerpt from the first paragraph on p. 1050 of L. Spilker (2019):
Saturn's ring system acts like a seismograph, providing a measure of Saturn's internal oscillations (or normal modes) that directly probe the interior of the planet … and provide a means for measuring its deep rotation rate. These vibrations, determined by Saturn's nonuniform internal structure, are probably driven by convection inside the planet, which cause oscillations in Saturn's gravity field … Preliminary modeling of the propagation behavior of this collection of waves provides an interior rotation rate for Saturn of ∼ 10.6 hours … |
Hexagon Storm
Image on the Right: obtained from this NASA/JPL site; image on the Left: obtained from this NASA Newsletter. See also the wikipedia page titled, Saturn's hexagon.
FIGURE 1 | FIGURE 2 |
---|---|
Post Cassini
Binary Mass-Transfer
Several key references:
- [Paper DMTF (2006)] M. C. R. D'Souza, P. M. Motl, J. E. Tohline & J. Frank (2006), ApJ, 643, p. 381: Numerical Simulations of the Onset and Stability of dynamical Mass Transfer in Binaries
- [Paper MFTD (2007)] P. M. Motl, J. Frank, J. E. Tohline & M. C. R. D'Souza (2007), ApJ, 670, p. 1314: The Stability of Double White Dwarf Binaries Undergoing Direct-Impact Accretion
- [Paper MFSCFEDT (2017)] P. M. Motl, J. Frank, J. Staff, G. C. Clayton, C. L. Fryer, W. Even, S. Diehl & J. E. Tohline (2017), ApJSuppl., Vol. 229, Issue 2, article id. 27, 41 pp.: A Comparison of Grid-based and SPH Binary Mass-transfer and Merger Simulations
FIGURE 3: Nonlinear-Amplitude Distortions that Develop in Three Separate Model Evolutions | ||
---|---|---|
Evolution A | Evolution B | Evolution C |
MFTD (2007) |
MFSCFEDT (2017) |
MFSCFEDT (2017) |
†The evolution identified here as Model Q0.5P_G1 was first discussed in §5.2 of DMTF (2006), wherein it was identified as Model Q0.5-Da; the caption to Figure 7 of that paper contains a link to an (mpeg_file = video3-2.mpg) animation that presents a 3D rendering of this model's evolution. |
The following discussion has largely been extracted from §3.1.4 of MFSCFEDT (2017):
In §4 of their paper, MFTD (2007) point out that in the vicinity of the accretor some of the models developed nonlinear-amplitude "equatorial distortions with [azimuthal mode numbers] <math>~6 \ge m \ge 3</math>." As is illustrated by the trio of images displayed in the bottom row of Figure 3, above, at a certain point (or points) in each of these binary mass-transfer evolutions … the disk surrounding the accretor has a triangular shape … This trio of triangular shaped images come from, respectively, evolutionary times: (A, B, C) = (15.3, 17.50, 24.33), as measured in terms of initial orbital periods. |
Related Discussions
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |