Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/Appendix/Ramblings/Azimuthal Distortions"
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Note that, as viewed from a frame of reference that is rotating with the mode pattern | Note that, as viewed from a frame of reference that is rotating with the mode pattern frequency, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<math>\Omega_p \equiv \frac{\omega_R}{m} = \Omega_0\biggl(\frac{y_1}{m}+1\biggr) \, ,</math> | <math>\Omega_p \equiv \frac{\omega_R}{m} = \Omega_0\biggl(\frac{y_1}{m}+1\biggr) \, ,</math> | ||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
whose relative amplitude — with a radial structure as specified inside the curly braces — is undergoing a uniform exponential growth but is otherwise unchanging. | |||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
Revision as of 01:05, 4 January 2016
Analyzing Azimuthal Distortions
|
|---|
| | Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Adopted Notation
We will adopt the notation of J. E. Tohline & I. Hachisu (1988, ApJ, 361, 394). Specifically, drawing on their equation (2) but ignoring variations in the vertical coordinate, the mass density is given by the expression,
|
<math>~\rho</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\rho_0 \biggl[ 1 + f(\varpi)e^{-i(\omega t - m\phi)} \biggr] \, ,</math> |
where it is understood that <math>~\rho_0</math>, which defines the structure of the initial axisymmetric equilibrium configuration, is generally a function of the cylindrical radial coordinate, <math>~\varpi</math>.
Using the subscript, <math>~m</math>, to identify the time-invariant coefficients and functions that characterize the intrinsic eigenvector of each azimuthal eigen-mode, and acknowledging that the associated eigenfrequency will in general be imaginary, that is,
|
<math>~\omega_m</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\omega_R + i\omega_I \, ,</math> |
we expect each unstable mode to display the following behavior:
|
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_0} - 1 \biggr]</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~f_m(\varpi)e^{-i[\omega_R t + i \omega_I t - m\phi_m(\varpi)]} </math> |
|
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl\{ f_m(\varpi)e^{-im\phi_m(\varpi)}\biggr\} e^{-i\omega_R t } \cdot e^{\omega_I t} </math> |
|
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl\{ f_m(\varpi)e^{-i[\omega_R t + m\phi_m(\varpi)]} \biggr\} e^{\omega_I t} \, .</math> |
Adopting Kojima's (1986) notation, that is, defining,
|
<math>~y_1 \equiv \frac{\omega_R}{\Omega_0} - m</math> |
and |
<math>~y_2 \equiv \frac{\omega_I}{\Omega_0} \, ,</math> |
the eigenvector's behavior can furthermore be described by the expression,
|
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_0} - 1 \biggr]</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl\{ f_m(\varpi)e^{-i[(y_1+m) (\Omega_0 t) + m\phi_m(\varpi)]} \biggr\} e^{y_2 (\Omega_0 t)} </math> |
|
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl\{ f_m(\varpi)e^{-im[(y_1/m+1) (\Omega_0 t) + \phi_m(\varpi)]} \biggr\} e^{y_2 (\Omega_0 t)} \, .</math> |
Note that, as viewed from a frame of reference that is rotating with the mode pattern frequency,
<math>\Omega_p \equiv \frac{\omega_R}{m} = \Omega_0\biggl(\frac{y_1}{m}+1\biggr) \, ,</math>
we should find an eigenvector of the form,
|
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_0} - 1 \biggr]_\mathrm{rot} \equiv \biggl[ \frac{\rho}{\rho_0} - 1 \biggr]e^{im\Omega_p t}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl\{ f_m(\varpi)e^{-im[\phi_m(\varpi)]} \biggr\} e^{y_2 (\Omega_0 t)} \, ,</math> |
whose relative amplitude — with a radial structure as specified inside the curly braces — is undergoing a uniform exponential growth but is otherwise unchanging.
See Also
|
|
|---|
|
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |