Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/MathProjects/EigenvalueProblemN1"
(→Find Analytic Solutions to an Eigenvalue Problem: Try a couple of eigenvectors) |
(→Find Analytic Solutions to an Eigenvalue Problem: Make progress working through "third guess") |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{LSU_HBook_header}} | {{LSU_HBook_header}} | ||
<font color="red">'''Note from J. E. Tohline to Students with Good Mathematical Skills'''</font>: This is one of a set of well-defined research problems that are being posed, in the context of this online H_Book, as [[User:Tohline#Challenges_to_Young.2C_Applied_Mathematicians|challenges to young, applied mathematicians]]. The astronomy community's understanding of the ''Structure, Stability, and Dynamics'' of stars and galaxies would be strengthened if we had, in hand, a closed-form analytic solution to the problem being posed here. | <font color="red">'''Note from J. E. Tohline to Students with Good Mathematical Skills'''</font>: This is one of a set of well-defined research problems that are being posed, in the context of this online H_Book, as [[User:Tohline#Challenges_to_Young.2C_Applied_Mathematicians|challenges to young, applied mathematicians]]. The astronomy community's understanding of the ''Structure, Stability, and Dynamics'' of stars and galaxies would be strengthened if we had, in hand, a closed-form analytic solution to the problem being posed here. A solution can be obtained ''numerically'' with relative ease, but here the challenge is to find a closed-form analytic solution. As is true with most meaningful scientific research projects, it is not at all clear whether this problem ''has'' such a solution. In my judgment, however, it seems plausible that a closed-form solution can be discovered and such a solution would be of sufficient interest to the astronomical community that it would likely be publishable in a professional astronomy or physics journal. At the very least, this project offers an opportunity for a graduate student, an undergraduate, or even a talented high-school student (perhaps in connection with a mathematics science fair project?) to hone her/his research skills in applied mathematics. Also, I would be thrilled to include a solution to this problem — along with full credit to the solution's author — as a chapter in this online H_Book. Having retired from LSU, I am not in a position to financially support or formally advise students who are in pursuit of a higher-education degree. I would nevertheless be interested in sharing my expertise — and, perhaps, developing a collaborative relationship — with any individual who are interested in pursuing an answer to the mathematical research problem that is being posed here. | ||
==The Challenge== | ==The Challenge== | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
where, <math>~\alpha</math> is a known constant | where, <math>~\alpha</math> is a known constant. The desired functional solution is subject to the following two boundary conditions: <math>~\mathcal{G}_\sigma = 0</math> and <math>~d\mathcal{G}_\sigma/dx = 0</math> at <math>~x = 0</math>. Note that, in the context of astrophysical discussions, the interval of <math>~x</math> that is of particular interest is <math>0 \le x \le \pi</math>. | ||
==Analogous Problem with Known Analytic Solutions== | ==Analogous Problem with Known Analytic Solutions== | ||
Here is an analogous problem whose analytic solution is known. Anyone interested in tackling the ''challenge'', provided above, should study — and even extend — the | Here is an analogous problem whose analytic solution is known. Anyone interested in tackling the ''challenge'', provided above, should study — and even extend — the known set of solutions of this analogous problem. This exercise should provide at least partial preparation for addressing the above challenge. | ||
===Statement of the Problem=== | ===Statement of the Problem=== | ||
Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
===Try a Polynomial Expression for the Eigenfunction=== | ===Try a Polynomial Expression for the Eigenfunction=== | ||
Let's ''guess'' that the proper eigenfunction is a polynomial expression in <math>~x</math>. Specifically, try, | Let's ''guess'' that the proper eigenfunction is a polynomial expression in <math>~x</math>. Specifically, let's try a solution of the form, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<math>\mathcal{F}_\sigma = a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + fx^4 + gx^5 + \cdots </math> | <math>\mathcal{F}_\sigma = a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + fx^4 + gx^5 + \cdots </math> | ||
Line 84: | Line 83: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~(3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) a</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
Line 95: | Line 94: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
which '' | which ''will'' be satisfied as long as, <math>~\sigma = (2\alpha/3)^{1/2} \, .</math> We conclude, therefore, that the eigenvector defining the lowest-order (the simplest) solution to the governing ODE has an eigenfunction given by, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Line 112: | Line 111: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
with a corresponding eigenfrequency whose value is, | |||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Line 129: | Line 128: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
====Second Guess==== | ====Second Guess==== | ||
Line 170: | Line 168: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Plugging this trial eigenfunction into the governing 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE gives, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~\frac{4}{x}\biggl[1 - \frac{3}{2}x^2 \biggr] b + \biggl[3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha \biggr] (a + bx)</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~\frac{4b}{x} + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha -6) bx + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) a \, .</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
But this expression can be satisfied for all values of <math>~x</math> only if <math>~b = 0</math>, in which case the trial eigenfunction reduces to the earlier solution, <math>~\mathcal{F}_0</math>. We conclude, therefore, that our "second guess" does not generate a new solution to this eigenfunction problem. | |||
====Third Guess==== | |||
Try, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<math>\mathcal{F} = a + cx^2\, ,</math> | |||
</div> | |||
in which case, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~\frac{d\mathcal{F}}{dx}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~2cx \, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
and, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~\frac{d^2\mathcal{F}}{dx^2}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~2c \, .</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
Plugging this trial eigenfunction into the governing 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE therefore gives, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~2c(1 - x^2) + 8c(1 - \frac{3}{2}x^2 ) + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) (a + cx^2)</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~ \biggl[10c + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha )a\biggr] + \biggl[ (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) -14 \biggr]cx^2 \, .</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
This relation will be satisfied for all values of <math>~x</math> if both expressions inside the square brackets are simultaneously zero, that is, if, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~10c + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha )a</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~0 \, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
and, simultaneously, | |||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<math> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
</ | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~(3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) -14 </math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~0 \, .</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 03:08, 21 May 2015
Find Analytic Solutions to an Eigenvalue Problem
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Note from J. E. Tohline to Students with Good Mathematical Skills: This is one of a set of well-defined research problems that are being posed, in the context of this online H_Book, as challenges to young, applied mathematicians. The astronomy community's understanding of the Structure, Stability, and Dynamics of stars and galaxies would be strengthened if we had, in hand, a closed-form analytic solution to the problem being posed here. A solution can be obtained numerically with relative ease, but here the challenge is to find a closed-form analytic solution. As is true with most meaningful scientific research projects, it is not at all clear whether this problem has such a solution. In my judgment, however, it seems plausible that a closed-form solution can be discovered and such a solution would be of sufficient interest to the astronomical community that it would likely be publishable in a professional astronomy or physics journal. At the very least, this project offers an opportunity for a graduate student, an undergraduate, or even a talented high-school student (perhaps in connection with a mathematics science fair project?) to hone her/his research skills in applied mathematics. Also, I would be thrilled to include a solution to this problem — along with full credit to the solution's author — as a chapter in this online H_Book. Having retired from LSU, I am not in a position to financially support or formally advise students who are in pursuit of a higher-education degree. I would nevertheless be interested in sharing my expertise — and, perhaps, developing a collaborative relationship — with any individual who are interested in pursuing an answer to the mathematical research problem that is being posed here.
The Challenge
Formally, this is an eigenvalue problem. Find one or more analytic expression(s) for the (eigen)function, <math>~\mathcal{G}_\sigma(x)</math> — and, simultaneously, the unknown value of the (eigen)frequency, <math>~\sigma</math> — that satisfies the following 2nd-order, ordinary differential equation:
<math>
(x^2\sin x ) \frac{d^2\mathcal{G}_\sigma}{dx^2} + 2 \biggl[ x \sin x + x^2 \cos x \biggr] \frac{d\mathcal{G}_\sigma}{dx} +
\biggl[ \sigma^2 x^3 - 2\alpha ( \sin x - x\cos x ) \biggr] \mathcal{G}_\sigma = 0 \, ,
</math>
where, <math>~\alpha</math> is a known constant. The desired functional solution is subject to the following two boundary conditions: <math>~\mathcal{G}_\sigma = 0</math> and <math>~d\mathcal{G}_\sigma/dx = 0</math> at <math>~x = 0</math>. Note that, in the context of astrophysical discussions, the interval of <math>~x</math> that is of particular interest is <math>0 \le x \le \pi</math>.
Analogous Problem with Known Analytic Solutions
Here is an analogous problem whose analytic solution is known. Anyone interested in tackling the challenge, provided above, should study — and even extend — the known set of solutions of this analogous problem. This exercise should provide at least partial preparation for addressing the above challenge.
Statement of the Problem
As above, the task here is to find one or more analytic expression(s) for the (eigen)function, <math>~\mathcal{F}_\sigma(x)</math> — and, simultaneously, the unknown value of the (eigen)frequency, <math>~\sigma</math> — that satisfies the following 2nd-order, ordinary differential equation:
<math>
(1 - x^2) \frac{d^2 \mathcal{F}_\sigma}{dx^2} + \frac{4}{x}\biggl[1 - \frac{3}{2}x^2 \biggr] \frac{d\mathcal{F}_\sigma}{dx} + \biggl[3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha \biggr] \mathcal{F}_\sigma = 0 .
</math>
Try a Polynomial Expression for the Eigenfunction
Let's guess that the proper eigenfunction is a polynomial expression in <math>~x</math>. Specifically, let's try a solution of the form,
<math>\mathcal{F}_\sigma = a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + fx^4 + gx^5 + \cdots </math>
truncated at progressively higher- and higher-order terms.
Lowest-order mode (Mode 0)
Try,
<math>\mathcal{F} = a \, ,</math>
in which case,
<math>~\frac{d\mathcal{F}}{dx}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, ,</math> |
and,
<math>~\frac{d^2\mathcal{F}}{dx^2}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, .</math> |
So, the governing 2nd-order ODE reduces to,
<math>~(3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) a</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, ,</math> |
which will be satisfied as long as, <math>~\sigma = (2\alpha/3)^{1/2} \, .</math> We conclude, therefore, that the eigenvector defining the lowest-order (the simplest) solution to the governing ODE has an eigenfunction given by,
<math>~\mathcal{F}_0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~a = \mathrm{constant} \, ,</math> |
with a corresponding eigenfrequency whose value is,
<math>~\sigma_0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl(\frac{2\alpha}{3} \biggr)^{1/2} \, .</math> |
Second Guess
Try,
<math>\mathcal{F} = a + bx \, ,</math>
in which case,
<math>~\frac{d\mathcal{F}}{dx}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~b \, ,</math> |
and,
<math>~\frac{d^2\mathcal{F}}{dx^2}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, .</math> |
Plugging this trial eigenfunction into the governing 2nd-order ODE gives,
<math>~0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\frac{4}{x}\biggl[1 - \frac{3}{2}x^2 \biggr] b + \biggl[3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha \biggr] (a + bx)</math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\frac{4b}{x} + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha -6) bx + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) a \, .</math> |
But this expression can be satisfied for all values of <math>~x</math> only if <math>~b = 0</math>, in which case the trial eigenfunction reduces to the earlier solution, <math>~\mathcal{F}_0</math>. We conclude, therefore, that our "second guess" does not generate a new solution to this eigenfunction problem.
Third Guess
Try,
<math>\mathcal{F} = a + cx^2\, ,</math>
in which case,
<math>~\frac{d\mathcal{F}}{dx}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~2cx \, ,</math> |
and,
<math>~\frac{d^2\mathcal{F}}{dx^2}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~2c \, .</math> |
Plugging this trial eigenfunction into the governing 2nd-order ODE therefore gives,
<math>~0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~2c(1 - x^2) + 8c(1 - \frac{3}{2}x^2 ) + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) (a + cx^2)</math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \biggl[10c + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha )a\biggr] + \biggl[ (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) -14 \biggr]cx^2 \, .</math> |
This relation will be satisfied for all values of <math>~x</math> if both expressions inside the square brackets are simultaneously zero, that is, if,
<math>~10c + (3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha )a</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, ,</math> |
and, simultaneously,
<math>~(3\sigma^2 - 2 \alpha ) -14 </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~0 \, .</math> |
- Mode 1:
- <math>x_1 = a + b\chi_0^2</math>, in which case,
<math> \frac{dx}{d\chi_0} = 2b\chi_0; ~~~~ \frac{d^2 x}{d\chi_0^2} = 2b; </math>
<math>
\frac{1}{(1 - \chi_0^2)} \biggl\{ 2b (1 - \chi_0^2) + 8b \biggl[1 - \frac{3}{2}\chi_0^2 \biggr] + A_1 \biggl(1 + \frac{b}{a}\chi_0^2 \biggr) \biggr\} = 0 ,
</math>
where,
<math> A_1 \equiv \frac{a}{\gamma_\mathrm{g}}\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{2\pi G\rho_c} \biggr) \omega_1^2+ 2(4 - 3\gamma_\mathrm{g}) \biggr] . </math>
Therefore,
<math>
(A_1 + 10b) + \biggl[ \biggl(\frac{b}{a}\biggr) A_1 - 14b \biggr] \chi_0^2 = 0 ,
</math>
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~~~ A_1 = - 10b ~~~~~\mathrm{and} ~~~~~ A_1 = 14a
</math>
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~~~ \frac{b}{a} = -\frac{7}{5} ~~~~~\mathrm{and} ~~~~~ \frac{A_1}{a} = 14 = \frac{1}{\gamma_\mathrm{g}}\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{3}{2\pi G\rho_c} \biggr) \omega_1^2+ 2(4 - 3\gamma_\mathrm{g}) \biggr] .
</math>
Hence,
<math>
\biggl( \frac{3}{2\pi G\rho_c} \biggr) \omega_1^2 = 20\gamma_\mathrm{g} -8
</math>
<math>
\Rightarrow ~~~~~ \omega_1^2 = \frac{2}{3}\biggl( 4\pi G\rho_c \biggr) (5\gamma_\mathrm{g} -2)
</math>
and, to within an arbitrary normalization factor,
<math> x_1 = 1 - \frac{7}{5}\chi_0^2 . </math>
Astrophysical Context
A star that is composed entirely of a gas for which the pressure varies as the square of the gas density will have an equilibrium structure that is defined by, what astronomers refer to as, an <math>~n=1</math> polytrope. Inside such an equilibrium structure, the density of the gas will vary with radial position according to the expression,
<math>~\frac{\rho}{\rho_c} = \frac{\sin x}{x} \, ,</math>
where, <math>~\rho_c</math> is the density at the center of the star, and,
<math>~x</math> |
<math>~\equiv</math> |
<math>~\pi\biggl(\frac{r}{R}\biggr) \, ,</math> |
where, <math>~R</math> is the radius of the equilibrium star. Notice that, according to this expression, the density will drop to zero when <math>~r = R</math>, in which case, <math>~x = \pi</math>. If a star of this type is nudged out of equilibrium — for example, squeezed slightly — in such a way that it maintains its spherical symmetry, the star will begin to undergo periodic, radial oscillations about its original equilibrium radius. The 2nd-order ODE whose solution is being sought in the above challenge is the equation that describes the behavior of these oscillations. In particular, the function,
<math>~\mathcal{G}_\sigma(x) \equiv \frac{\delta x}{x}</math>
describes the relative amplitude of the oscillation as a function of position, <math>~x</math>, within the star, and <math>~\sigma</math> gives the frequency of the oscillation.
Related Discussions
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |