Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/AxisymmetricConfigurations/SolvingPE"
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
! style="height: 150px; width: 150px; background-color:#D0FFFF;" |[[User:Tohline/AxisymmetricConfigurations/PoissonEq#Solving_the_.28Multi-dimensional.29_Poisson_Equation_Numerically|Solving the<br /> Poisson Equation]] | ! style="height: 150px; width: 150px; background-color:#D0FFFF;" |[[User:Tohline/AxisymmetricConfigurations/PoissonEq#Solving_the_.28Multi-dimensional.29_Poisson_Equation_Numerically|Solving the<br /> Poisson Equation]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and, separately, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] have argued that a reasonably good approximation to the gravitational potential due to any extended axisymmetric mass distribution can be obtained by adding up the contributions due to many ''thin rings'' — with math>~\delta M(\varpi^', z^')</math> being the appropriate differential mass contributed by each ring element — that are positioned at various meridional coordinate locations throughout the mass distribution. According to Stahler's derivation, for example (see his equation 11 and the explanatory text that follows it), the differential contribution to the potential, <math>~\delta\Phi_g(\varpi, z)</math>, due to each differential mass element is: | [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194..393D Deupree (1974)] and, separately, [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..155S Stahler (1983a)] have argued that a reasonably good approximation to the gravitational potential due to any extended axisymmetric mass distribution can be obtained by adding up the contributions due to many ''thin rings'' — with <math>~\delta M(\varpi^', z^')</math> being the appropriate differential mass contributed by each ring element — that are positioned at various meridional coordinate locations throughout the mass distribution. According to Stahler's derivation, for example (see his equation 11 and the explanatory text that follows it), the differential contribution to the potential, <math>~\delta\Phi_g(\varpi, z)</math>, due to each differential mass element is: | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Stahler's expression for each ''thin ring'' contribution is | It is easy to see that Stahler's expression for each ''thin ring'' contribution is a generalization of the "Key Equation" expression for <math>~\Phi_\mathrm{TR}</math> given above: The "TR" expression assumes that the ring cuts through the meridional plane at <math>~(\varpi^', z^') = (a, 0)</math>, while Stahler's expression works for individual rings that cut through at any coordinate location. Given that, in cylindrical coordinates, the differential mass element is, <math>~\delta M = 2\pi \rho(\varpi^', z^') \varpi^' d\varpi^' dz</math>, it is at the same time easy to see that Stahler's expression for <math>~\delta \Phi_g</math> is identical to the integrand of the "Key Equation" that appears in the top panel of this synopsis table. It is therefore clear that Deupree and, separately, Stahler were developing algorithms to numerically evaluate the gravitational potential of systems with axisymmetric mass distributions that are identical to the … well before Cohl & Tohline (1999) derived the generalized "Key Equation" highlighted above. | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> |
Revision as of 03:55, 30 July 2018
Common Theme: Determining the Gravitational Potential for Axisymmetric Mass Distributions
You have arrived at this page from our Tiled Menu by clicking on the chapter title that is also referenced in the panel of the following table that is colored light blue. You may proceed directly to that chapter by clicking (again) on the same chapter title, as it appears in the table. However, we have brought you to this intermediate page in order to bring to your attention that there are a number of additional chapters that have a strong thematic connection to the chapter you have selected. The common thread is the "Key Equation" presented in the top panel of the table.
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Synopses
The gravitational potential (both inside and outside) of any axisymmetric mass distribution may be determined from the integral expression,
where, <math>~K(\mu)</math> is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. This "Key Equation" may be straightforwardly obtained, for example, by combining Eqs. (31), (32b), and (24) from Cohl & Tohline (1999) and recognizing that the relevant differential area, <math>~d\sigma^' = \varpi^' d\varpi^' dz^' \int_0^{2\pi} d\varphi = 2\pi\varpi^'~d\varpi^' dz^'</math>; see also, Bannikova et al. (2011), Trova, Huré & Hersant (2012), and Fukushima (2016). |
||||||||||||
In §102 of a book titled, The Theory of the Potential, W. D. MacMillan (1958; originally, 1930) derives an analytic expression for the gravitational potential of a uniform, infinitesimally thin, circular "hoop" of radius, <math>~a</math>. Throughout our related discussions, we generally will refer to this "Key Equation" from MacMillan as providing an expression for the,
See also, O. D. Kellogg (1929), §III.4, Exercise (4). As is reviewed in the chapter of our H_Book titled, Dyson-Wong Tori, a number of research groups over the years have re-derived this "thin ring" approximation in the context of their search for effective and insightful ways to determine the gravitational potential of axisymmetric systems. |
||||||||||||
Deupree (1974) and, separately, Stahler (1983a) have argued that a reasonably good approximation to the gravitational potential due to any extended axisymmetric mass distribution can be obtained by adding up the contributions due to many thin rings — with <math>~\delta M(\varpi^', z^')</math> being the appropriate differential mass contributed by each ring element — that are positioned at various meridional coordinate locations throughout the mass distribution. According to Stahler's derivation, for example (see his equation 11 and the explanatory text that follows it), the differential contribution to the potential, <math>~\delta\Phi_g(\varpi, z)</math>, due to each differential mass element is:
It is easy to see that Stahler's expression for each thin ring contribution is a generalization of the "Key Equation" expression for <math>~\Phi_\mathrm{TR}</math> given above: The "TR" expression assumes that the ring cuts through the meridional plane at <math>~(\varpi^', z^') = (a, 0)</math>, while Stahler's expression works for individual rings that cut through at any coordinate location. Given that, in cylindrical coordinates, the differential mass element is, <math>~\delta M = 2\pi \rho(\varpi^', z^') \varpi^' d\varpi^' dz</math>, it is at the same time easy to see that Stahler's expression for <math>~\delta \Phi_g</math> is identical to the integrand of the "Key Equation" that appears in the top panel of this synopsis table. It is therefore clear that Deupree and, separately, Stahler were developing algorithms to numerically evaluate the gravitational potential of systems with axisymmetric mass distributions that are identical to the … well before Cohl & Tohline (1999) derived the generalized "Key Equation" highlighted above. |
||||||||||||
Using Toroidal Coordinates to Determine the Gravitational Potential |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Related Discussions
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |