Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/Apps/Blaes85SlimLimit"
m (→Singular Sturm-Liouville Problem: Change index "n" to "j") |
|||
Line 309: | Line 309: | ||
===Singular Sturm-Liouville Problem=== | ===Singular Sturm-Liouville Problem=== | ||
Drawing on Theorem 3.16 from [http://lsec.cc.ac.cn/~hyu/teaching/shonm2013/STWchap3.2p.pdf Yu's class notes], we find that each one of the set of | Drawing on Theorem 3.16 from [http://lsec.cc.ac.cn/~hyu/teaching/shonm2013/STWchap3.2p.pdf Yu's class notes], we find that each one of the set of <math>j=0 \rightarrow \infty</math> ''Jacobi polynomials'', <math>~J_j^{\alpha,\beta}(x)</math>, is an eigenfunction of the singular Sturm-Liouville problem whose mathematical definition is provided by the 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~\mathcal{L}_{\alpha,\beta} | <math>~\mathcal{L}_{\alpha,\beta}J_j^{\alpha,\beta}(x)</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
Line 321: | Line 321: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>~\ | <math>~\lambda_j^{\alpha,\beta}J_j^{\alpha,\beta}(x) \, ,</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 359: | Line 359: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
and the corresponding | and the corresponding j<sup>th</sup> eigenvalue is, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | ||
Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td align="right"> | <td align="right"> | ||
<math>~\ | <math>~\lambda_j^{\alpha,\beta}</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
Line 371: | Line 371: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~j(j+\alpha+\beta + 1) \, .</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
(Note that we have used " | (Note that we have used "j" instead of the more traditional use of "n" to identify the specific Jacobi polynomial, because we are already using "n" to denote the polytropic index.) | ||
=See Also= | =See Also= |
Revision as of 17:44, 4 May 2016
Stability of PP Tori in the Slim Torus Limit
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Statement of the Eigenvalue Problem
Here, we build on our discussion in an accompanying chapter in which five published analyses of nonaxisymmetric instabilities in Papaloizou-Pringle tori were reviewed: The discovery paper, PP84, and papers by four separate groups that were published within a couple of years of the discovery paper — Papaloizou & Pringle (1985), Blaes (1985), Kojima (1986), and Goldreich, Goodman & Narayan (1986). Following the lead of Blaes (1985; hereafter Blaes85), in particular, we have shown that the relevant eigenvalue problem is defined by the following 2nd-order PDE,
<math>~0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \frac{\partial^2(\delta W)^{(0)}}{\partial \eta^2} + (1-\eta^2) \cdot \frac{\partial^2(\delta W)^{(0)}}{\partial\theta^2} + \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 \biggr] \cdot \frac{\partial (\delta W)^{(0)}}{\partial \eta} + 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 (\delta W)^{(0)} \, , </math> |
where, <math>~\delta W^{(0)}</math> is the dimensionless enthalpy perturbation. Making the substitution,
<math>~\delta W^{(0)} ~\rightarrow~ V(\eta) \exp (ik\theta) \, ,</math>
this governing equation — now, a one-dimensional, 2nd-order ODE — becomes,
<math>~0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \frac{d^2V}{d \eta^2} - k^2(1-\eta^2) V + \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 \biggr] \cdot \frac{d V}{d \eta} + 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 V \, . </math> |
Making the additional substitution,
<math>~V ~\rightarrow~ \eta^{|k|} \Upsilon(\eta) \, ,</math>
and appreciating that,
<math>~\frac{dV}{d\eta}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \, ,</math> |
<math>~\frac{d^2V}{d\eta^2}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|-2}\Upsilon + 2|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2}\, ,</math> |
the governing ODE becomes,
<math>~ \biggl\{k^2(1-\eta^2) - 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2\biggr\} \eta^{|k|}\Upsilon </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \biggl[ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|-2}\Upsilon + 2|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} \biggr] + \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k|\eta^{|k|-1} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~(1-\eta^2) \biggl[ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|}\Upsilon + 2|k|\eta^{|k|+1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{|k|+2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2}\biggr] + \biggl[ (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^2 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k|\eta^{|k|} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|+1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\eta^{|k|}(1-\eta^2) \biggl[ k^2 \Upsilon + (2|k|+1)\eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} \biggr] - \eta^{|k|}\biggl[ 2 n \eta^2 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k| \Upsilon + \eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
<math>~\Rightarrow~~~ - 2n\eta^2 \biggl[\biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 -|k|\biggr] \Upsilon </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~(1-\eta^2) \biggl[ \eta^{2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} + (2|k|+1)\eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] - \biggl[ 2 n \eta^3 \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] \, . </math> |
Finally, then, making the independent variable substitution,
<math>~\eta^2 ~\rightarrow ~ y</math> <math>~\Rightarrow</math> <math>~dy = 2\eta d\eta</math>
in which case,
<math>~\frac{d}{d\eta}</math> |
<math>~\rightarrow</math> |
<math>~2y^{1/2}\frac{d}{dy}</math> |
<math>~\frac{d^2}{d\eta^2}</math> |
<math>~\rightarrow</math> |
<math>~2\frac{d}{dy} + 4y\frac{d^2}{dy^2} \, .</math> |
and,
<math>~ - 2ny \biggl[\biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 -|k|\biggr] \Upsilon </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ (1-y) y \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} + (2|k|+1)(1-y)y^{1/2} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} - 2 n y^{3/2} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ 4(1-y)y^2 \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{dy^2} + 2(1-y) y \frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} + 2(2|k|+1)(1-y)y \frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} - 4 n y^{2} \frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} </math> |
<math>~\Rightarrow~~~~ - \frac{n}{2}\biggl[\biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 -|k|\biggr] \Upsilon </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ (1-y)y \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{dy^2} + \frac{1}{2}(1-y) \frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} + \frac{1}{2}(2|k|+1)(1-y)\frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} - n y \frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ (1-y)y \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{dy^2} + (|k|+1)(1-y)\frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} - n y \frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ (1-y)y \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{dy^2} + (|k|+1)\frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} -y (|k|+1+n)\frac{d\Upsilon}{dy} \, . </math> |
This matches equation (3.9) of Blaes85. According to Blaes (1985), this equation "… is a standard eigenvalue problem whose only solutions are the Jacobi polynomials …"
Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
| Go Home |
Solution
My own background training and experience has not previously exposed me to the general class of Jacobi polynomials. In my effort to understand this class of polynomials and, specifically, their relationship to the Sturm-Liouville Equation, I have found the following references to be useful:
- PDF-formatted class notes presented by Professor Haijun Yu
- PDF-formatted class notes presented by Professor Russell Herman
- A couple of scanned pages from §22 of Abramowitz & Stegun (1972) posted online by Colin Macdonald
Singular Sturm-Liouville Problem
Drawing on Theorem 3.16 from Yu's class notes, we find that each one of the set of <math>j=0 \rightarrow \infty</math> Jacobi polynomials, <math>~J_j^{\alpha,\beta}(x)</math>, is an eigenfunction of the singular Sturm-Liouville problem whose mathematical definition is provided by the 2nd-order ODE,
<math>~\mathcal{L}_{\alpha,\beta}J_j^{\alpha,\beta}(x)</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\lambda_j^{\alpha,\beta}J_j^{\alpha,\beta}(x) \, ,</math> |
where the differential operator,
<math>~\mathcal{L}_{\alpha,\beta}</math> |
<math>~\equiv</math> |
<math>~ -(1-x)^{-\alpha}(1+x)^{-\beta} \cdot \frac{d}{dx} \biggl[ (1-x)^{\alpha+1}(1+x)^{\beta+1} \cdot \frac{d}{dx} \biggr] </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ (x^2-1)\cdot \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + [\alpha - \beta + (\alpha+\beta+2)x]\cdot \frac{d}{dx} \, ,</math> |
and the corresponding jth eigenvalue is,
<math>~\lambda_j^{\alpha,\beta}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~j(j+\alpha+\beta + 1) \, .</math> |
(Note that we have used "j" instead of the more traditional use of "n" to identify the specific Jacobi polynomial, because we are already using "n" to denote the polytropic index.)
See Also
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |