Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/Apps/Blaes85SlimLimit"
(Begin chapter on Jacobi Polynomial solution to eigenvalue problem) |
(→Statement of the Eigenvalue Problem: Attempting to derive Blaes85 equation (3.9)) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center"> | <td align="center"> | ||
<math>~ | <math>~=</math> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="left"> | <td align="left"> | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
where, <math>~\delta W^{(0)}</math> is the dimensionless enthalpy perturbation. | where, <math>~\delta W^{(0)}</math> is the dimensionless enthalpy perturbation. Making the substitution, | ||
<div align="center"> | |||
<math>~\delta W^{(0)} ~\rightarrow~ V(\eta) \exp (ik\theta) \, ,</math> | |||
</div> | |||
this governing equation — now, a one-dimensional, 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE — becomes, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~0</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~ | |||
\eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \frac{d^2V}{d \eta^2} | |||
- k^2(1-\eta^2) V | |||
+ \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 | |||
\biggr] \cdot \frac{d V}{d \eta} | |||
+ 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 V \, . | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
Making the additional substitution, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<math>~V ~\rightarrow~ \eta^{|k|} \Upsilon(\eta) \, ,</math> | |||
</div> | |||
and appreciating that, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~\frac{dV}{d\eta}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~\frac{d^2V}{d\eta^2}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~ | |||
|k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|-2}\Upsilon | |||
+ 2|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} | |||
+ \eta^{|k|} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2}\, ,</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
the governing ODE becomes, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~ | |||
\biggl\{k^2(1-\eta^2) - 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2\biggr\} \eta^{|k|}\Upsilon | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~ | |||
\eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \biggl[ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|-2}\Upsilon | |||
+ 2|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} | |||
+ \eta^{|k|} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} | |||
\biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 | |||
\biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k|\eta^{|k|-1} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~(1-\eta^2) | |||
\biggl[ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|}\Upsilon | |||
+ 2|k|\eta^{|k|+1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} | |||
+ \eta^{|k|+2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2}\biggr] | |||
+ \biggl[ (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^2 | |||
\biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k|\eta^{|k|} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|+1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
| |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~\eta^{|k|}(1-\eta^2) | |||
\biggl[ k^2 \Upsilon | |||
+ (2|k|+1)\eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} | |||
+ \eta^{2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} \biggr] | |||
- \eta^{|k|}\biggl[ 2 n \eta^2 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k| \Upsilon + \eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~\Rightarrow~~~ | |||
- 2n\eta^2 \biggl[\biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 -|k|\biggr] \Upsilon | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~(1-\eta^2) | |||
\biggl[ \eta^{2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} + (2|k|+1)\eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] | |||
- \biggl[ 2 n \eta^3 \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] | |||
</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | |||
=See Also= | =See Also= |
Revision as of 22:46, 3 May 2016
Stability of PP Tori in the Slim Torus Limit
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Statement of the Eigenvalue Problem
Here, we build on our discussion in an accompanying chapter in which five published analyses of nonaxisymmetric instabilities in Papaloizou-Pringle tori were reviewed: The discovery paper, PP84, and papers by four separate groups that were published within a couple of years of the discovery paper — Papaloizou & Pringle (1985), Blaes (1985), Kojima (1986), and Goldreich, Goodman & Narayan (1986). Following the lead of Blaes (1985; hereafter Blaes85), in particular, we have shown that the relevant eigenvalue problem is defined by the following 2nd-order PDE,
<math>~0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \frac{\partial^2(\delta W)^{(0)}}{\partial \eta^2} + (1-\eta^2) \cdot \frac{\partial^2(\delta W)^{(0)}}{\partial\theta^2} + \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 \biggr] \cdot \frac{\partial (\delta W)^{(0)}}{\partial \eta} + 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 (\delta W)^{(0)} \, , </math> |
where, <math>~\delta W^{(0)}</math> is the dimensionless enthalpy perturbation. Making the substitution,
<math>~\delta W^{(0)} ~\rightarrow~ V(\eta) \exp (ik\theta) \, ,</math>
this governing equation — now, a one-dimensional, 2nd-order ODE — becomes,
<math>~0</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \frac{d^2V}{d \eta^2} - k^2(1-\eta^2) V + \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 \biggr] \cdot \frac{d V}{d \eta} + 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 V \, . </math> |
Making the additional substitution,
<math>~V ~\rightarrow~ \eta^{|k|} \Upsilon(\eta) \, ,</math>
and appreciating that,
<math>~\frac{dV}{d\eta}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \, ,</math> |
<math>~\frac{d^2V}{d\eta^2}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|-2}\Upsilon + 2|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2}\, ,</math> |
the governing ODE becomes,
<math>~ \biggl\{k^2(1-\eta^2) - 2n\eta^2 \biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2\biggr\} \eta^{|k|}\Upsilon </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~ \eta^2 (1-\eta^2)\cdot \biggl[ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|-2}\Upsilon + 2|k|\eta^{|k|-1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} \biggr] + \biggl[ \eta (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^3 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k|\eta^{|k|-1} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~(1-\eta^2) \biggl[ |k|[|k|-1] \eta^{|k|}\Upsilon + 2|k|\eta^{|k|+1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{|k|+2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2}\biggr] + \biggl[ (1-\eta^2) -2 n \eta^2 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k|\eta^{|k|} \Upsilon + \eta^{|k|+1} \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
|
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\eta^{|k|}(1-\eta^2) \biggl[ k^2 \Upsilon + (2|k|+1)\eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} + \eta^{2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} \biggr] - \eta^{|k|}\biggl[ 2 n \eta^2 \biggr] \cdot \biggl[ |k| \Upsilon + \eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
<math>~\Rightarrow~~~ - 2n\eta^2 \biggl[\biggl( \frac{\sigma}{\Omega_0} + m \biggr)^2 -|k|\biggr] \Upsilon </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~(1-\eta^2) \biggl[ \eta^{2} \frac{d^2\Upsilon}{d\eta^2} + (2|k|+1)\eta \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] - \biggl[ 2 n \eta^3 \frac{d\Upsilon}{d\eta} \biggr] </math> |
See Also
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |