Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes/Analytic1.5 3"
(→Step 8: Throughout the envelope ~(\eta_i \le \eta \le \eta_s): Fix a few mistakes/incompletions in Step 8 expressions) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Here we lay out the procedure for constructing a [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes#BiPolytropes|bipolytrope]] in which the core has an <math>~n_c=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytropic index and the envelope has an <math>~n_e=3</math> polytropic index. We will build our discussion around the work of [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1930MNRAS..91....4M E. A. Milne (1930, MNRAS, 91, 4)]. While this system cannot be described by closed-form, analytic expressions, it is of particular interest because — as far as we have been able to determine — its examination by Milne represents the first "composite polytrope" to be discussed in the astrophysics literature. In deriving the properties of this model, we will follow the [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes#Solution_Steps|general solution steps for constructing a bipolytrope]] that are outlined in a separate chapter of this H_Book. That group of general solution steps was drawn largely from chapter IV, §28 of Chandrasekhar's book titled, "An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure" [[User:Tohline/Appendix/References#C67|[<b><font color="red">C67</font></b>]]], and at the end of that chapter (specifically, p. 182), Chandrasekhar acknowledges that Milne's "method is largely used in § 28." It seems fitting, therefore, that we highlight the features of the ''specific'' bipolytropic configuration that [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1930MNRAS..91....4M E. A. Milne (1930)] chose to build. | Here we lay out the procedure for constructing a [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes#BiPolytropes|bipolytrope]] in which the core has an <math>~n_c=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytropic index and the envelope has an <math>~n_e=3</math> polytropic index. We will build our discussion around the work of [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1930MNRAS..91....4M E. A. Milne (1930, MNRAS, 91, 4)]. While this system cannot be described by closed-form, analytic expressions, it is of particular interest because — as far as we have been able to determine — its examination by Milne represents the first "composite polytrope" to be discussed in the astrophysics literature. In deriving the properties of this model, we will follow the [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/BiPolytropes#Solution_Steps|general solution steps for constructing a bipolytrope]] that are outlined in a separate chapter of this H_Book. That group of general solution steps was drawn largely from chapter IV, §28 of Chandrasekhar's book titled, "An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure" [[User:Tohline/Appendix/References#C67|[<b><font color="red">C67</font></b>]]], and at the end of that chapter (specifically, p. 182), Chandrasekhar acknowledges that Milne's "method is largely used in § 28." It seems fitting, therefore, that we highlight the features of the ''specific'' bipolytropic configuration that [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1930MNRAS..91....4M E. A. Milne (1930)] chose to build. | ||
==Steps 2 & 3== | ==Our Derivation== | ||
===Steps 2 & 3=== | |||
Throughout the core, the properties of this bipolytrope can be expressed in terms of the Lane-Emden function, <math>~\theta(\xi)</math>, which derives from a solution of the 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE, | Throughout the core, the properties of this bipolytrope can be expressed in terms of the Lane-Emden function, <math>~\theta(\xi)</math>, which derives from a solution of the 2<sup>nd</sup>-order ODE, | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
The first zero of the function <math>~\theta(\xi)</math> and, hence, the surface of the corresponding isolated <math>~n=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytrope is located at <math>~\xi_s = 3.65375</math> (see Table 4 in chapter IV on p. 96 of [[User:Tohline/Appendix/References#C67|[<b><font color="red">C67</font></b>]]]). Hence, the interface between the core and the envelope can be positioned anywhere within the range, <math>~0 < \xi_i < \xi_s = 3.65375</math>. | The first zero of the function <math>~\theta(\xi)</math> and, hence, the surface of the corresponding isolated <math>~n=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytrope is located at <math>~\xi_s = 3.65375</math> (see Table 4 in chapter IV on p. 96 of [[User:Tohline/Appendix/References#C67|[<b><font color="red">C67</font></b>]]]). Hence, the interface between the core and the envelope can be positioned anywhere within the range, <math>~0 < \xi_i < \xi_s = 3.65375</math>. | ||
==Step 4: Throughout the core <math>~(0 \le \xi \le \xi_i)</math>== | ===Step 4: Throughout the core <math>~(0 \le \xi \le \xi_i)</math>=== | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | ||
Line 107: | Line 109: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
==Step 5: Interface Conditions== | ===Step 5: Interface Conditions=== | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
Line 194: | Line 196: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
==Step 8: Throughout the envelope <math>~(\eta_i \le \eta \le \eta_s)</math>== | ===Step 8: Throughout the envelope <math>~(\eta_i \le \eta \le \eta_s)</math>=== | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | <table border="0" cellpadding="3"> | ||
Line 303: | Line 305: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | |||
==Milne's (1930) Presentation== | |||
===Envelope's Equation of State=== | |||
As has been detailed in our [[User:Tohline/SR#Equation_of_State|introductory discussion of equations of state]] and as is summarized in the following table, often the total gas pressure, <math>~p_\mathrm{env}</math>, can be expressed as being the sum of three separate components: a component of ideal gas pressure, a component of radiation pressure, and a component due to a degenerate electron gas. | |||
<table width="95%" align="center" border=1 cellpadding=5> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center" width="25%"><font color="darkblue">Ideal Gas</font></td> | |||
<td align="center"><font color="darkblue">Degenerate Electron Gas</font></td> | |||
<td align="center" width="25%"><font color="darkblue">Radiation</font></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
{{User:Tohline/Math/EQ_EOSideal0A}} | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
{{User:Tohline/Math/EQ_ZTFG01}} | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
{{User:Tohline/Math/EQ_EOSradiation01}} | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1930MNRAS..91....4M E. A. Milne (1930)] considered that the effects of electron degeneracy pressure could be ignored in the envelope of his composite polytrope and, accordingly, the expression he used for the total pressure in the envelope was, | |||
<div align="center"> | |||
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center"> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td align="right"> | |||
<math>~p_\mathrm{env}</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="center"> | |||
<math>~=</math> | |||
</td> | |||
<td align="left"> | |||
<math>~P_\mathrm{gas} + P_\mathrm{rad} \, .</math> | |||
</td> | |||
</tr> | |||
</table> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:14, 27 May 2015
BiPolytrope with <math>n_c = \tfrac{3}{2}</math> and <math>n_e=3</math>
| Tiled Menu | Tables of Content | Banner Video | Tohline Home Page | |
Here we lay out the procedure for constructing a bipolytrope in which the core has an <math>~n_c=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytropic index and the envelope has an <math>~n_e=3</math> polytropic index. We will build our discussion around the work of E. A. Milne (1930, MNRAS, 91, 4). While this system cannot be described by closed-form, analytic expressions, it is of particular interest because — as far as we have been able to determine — its examination by Milne represents the first "composite polytrope" to be discussed in the astrophysics literature. In deriving the properties of this model, we will follow the general solution steps for constructing a bipolytrope that are outlined in a separate chapter of this H_Book. That group of general solution steps was drawn largely from chapter IV, §28 of Chandrasekhar's book titled, "An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure" [C67], and at the end of that chapter (specifically, p. 182), Chandrasekhar acknowledges that Milne's "method is largely used in § 28." It seems fitting, therefore, that we highlight the features of the specific bipolytropic configuration that E. A. Milne (1930) chose to build.
Our Derivation
Steps 2 & 3
Throughout the core, the properties of this bipolytrope can be expressed in terms of the Lane-Emden function, <math>~\theta(\xi)</math>, which derives from a solution of the 2nd-order ODE,
<math> \frac{1}{\xi^2} \frac{d}{d\xi} \biggl[ \xi^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\xi}\biggr] = - \theta^{3/2} \, , </math>
subject to the boundary conditions,
<math>~\theta = 1</math> and <math>~\frac{d\theta}{d\xi} = 0</math> at <math>~\xi = 0</math>.
The first zero of the function <math>~\theta(\xi)</math> and, hence, the surface of the corresponding isolated <math>~n=\tfrac{3}{2}</math> polytrope is located at <math>~\xi_s = 3.65375</math> (see Table 4 in chapter IV on p. 96 of [C67]). Hence, the interface between the core and the envelope can be positioned anywhere within the range, <math>~0 < \xi_i < \xi_s = 3.65375</math>.
Step 4: Throughout the core <math>~(0 \le \xi \le \xi_i)</math>
Specify: <math>~K_c</math> and <math>~\rho_0 ~\Rightarrow</math> |
|
|||
<math>~\rho</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\rho_0 \theta^{n_c}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\rho_0 \theta^{3/2}</math> |
<math>~P</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~K_c \rho_0^{1+1/n_c} \theta^{n_c + 1}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~K_c \rho_0^{5/3} \theta^{5/2}</math> |
<math>~r</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{(n_c + 1)K_c}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_0^{(1-n_c)/(2n_c)} \xi</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{5K_c}{8\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_0^{-1/6} \xi</math> |
<math>~M_r</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~4\pi \biggl[ \frac{(n_c + 1)K_c}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \rho_0^{(3-n_c)/(2n_c)} \biggl(-\xi^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\xi} \biggr)</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{5^3K_c^3}{2^5 \pi G^3} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_0^{1/2} \biggl(-\xi^2 \frac{d\theta}{d\xi} \biggr)</math> |
Step 5: Interface Conditions
|
Setting <math>~n_c=\tfrac{3}{2}</math>, <math>~n_e=3</math>, and <math>~\phi_i = 1 ~~~~\Rightarrow</math> |
|||
<math>\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{n_c}_i \phi_i^{-n_e}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{3/2}_i </math> |
<math>\biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c} \biggr) </math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\rho_0^{1/n_c - 1/n_e}\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-(1+1/n_e)} \theta^{1 - n_c/n_e}_i</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\rho_0^{1/3}\biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr)^{-4/3} \theta^{1/2}_i</math> |
<math>\frac{\eta_i}{\xi_i}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\biggl[ \frac{n_c + 1}{n_e+1} \biggr]^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) \theta_i^{(n_c-1)/2} \phi_i^{(1-n_e)/2}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\biggl(\frac{5}{8}\biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr) \theta_i^{1/4}</math> |
<math>\biggl( \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)_i</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\biggl[ \frac{n_c + 1}{n_e + 1} \biggr]^{1/2} \theta_i^{- (n_c + 1)/2} \phi_i^{(n_e+1)/2} \biggl( \frac{d\theta}{d\xi} \biggr)_i</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>\biggl(\frac{5}{8}\biggr)^{1/2} \theta_i^{- 5/4} \biggl( \frac{d\theta}{d\xi} \biggr)_i</math> |
Step 8: Throughout the envelope <math>~(\eta_i \le \eta \le \eta_s)</math>
|
Knowing: <math>~K_e/K_c</math> and <math>~\rho_e/\rho_0</math> from Step 5 <math>\Rightarrow</math> |
|||||
<math>~\rho</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\rho_e \phi^{n_e}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\rho_0 \biggl(\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0}\biggr) \phi^3</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\rho_0 \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c} \biggr) \theta^{3/2}_i \phi^3</math> |
<math>~P</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~K_e \rho_e^{1+1/n_e} \phi^{n_e + 1}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>K_c \rho_0^{4/3} \biggl(\frac{K_e }{K_c}\biggr) \biggl(\frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0}\biggr)^{4/3} \phi^{4}</math> |
<math>=</math> |
<math>K_c \rho_0^{5/3} \theta^{5/2}_i \phi^{4}</math> |
<math>~r</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{(n_e + 1)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_e^{(1-n_e)/(2n_e)} \eta</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_0^{-1/3} \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c}\biggr)^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\rho_e}{\rho_0} \biggr)^{-1/3} \eta</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl[ \frac{K_c}{\pi G} \biggr]^{1/2} \rho_0^{-1/6} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-1} \theta_i^{-1/4} \eta</math> |
<math>~M_r</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~4\pi \biggl[ \frac{(n_e + 1)K_e}{4\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \rho_e^{(3-n_e)/(2n_e)} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~4\pi \biggl[ \frac{K_c}{\pi G} \biggr]^{3/2} \biggl( \frac{K_e}{K_c}\biggr)^{3/2} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~\biggl( \frac{2^4}{\pi} \biggr)^{1/2} \biggl[ \frac{K_c}{G} \biggr]^{3/2} \rho_0^{1/2} \biggl( \frac{\mu_e}{\mu_c}\biggr)^{-2} \theta_i^{3/4} \biggl(-\eta^2 \frac{d\phi}{d\eta} \biggr)</math> |
Milne's (1930) Presentation
Envelope's Equation of State
As has been detailed in our introductory discussion of equations of state and as is summarized in the following table, often the total gas pressure, <math>~p_\mathrm{env}</math>, can be expressed as being the sum of three separate components: a component of ideal gas pressure, a component of radiation pressure, and a component due to a degenerate electron gas.
Ideal Gas | Degenerate Electron Gas | Radiation | ||||||||||
|
|
|
E. A. Milne (1930) considered that the effects of electron degeneracy pressure could be ignored in the envelope of his composite polytrope and, accordingly, the expression he used for the total pressure in the envelope was,
<math>~p_\mathrm{env}</math> |
<math>~=</math> |
<math>~P_\mathrm{gas} + P_\mathrm{rad} \, .</math> |
© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline |